This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this folio. Terms of use.

GeForce GTX 680

Over the past few months nosotros've been examining various aspects of the GPU market, and how gamers waiting for prices to calm down tin take various steps to ameliorate their situation by optimizing games or considering a new AMD APU as an entry-level solution. We've also discussed how the aggrandizement hits AMD and Nvidia GPUs differently, delved into the risks of buying a used GPU, and suggested steps readers can have to protect themselves and their investments. Our used GPU advice, however, presupposed that the reader was looking to buy a card of relatively recent vintage — think GPUs from Nvidia's Maxwell generation (2014), or AMD'southward Fury (2015) or first-generation Polaris (2016) production families. But what about older cards, similar flagship models from years ago?

Techspot recently took the GTX 680 for a spin to test that hypothesis, and its results are interesting. The GTX 680, for those of you who don't call up, was a major architectural overhaul from Fermi, Nvidia's previous GPU compages. The GK104 that Nvidia lunched back on March 22, 2022 was a 1536:128:32 (core count:texture mapping units:render output units) architecture with 192 GPU cores per SMX block. It competed confronting AMD's GCN 1.0 architecture at launch and drew significantly less ability than AMD's various solutions. This was the commencement of a state of affairs that has persisted until the present day: While AMD has absolutely fabricated its own power efficiency improvements from GCN 1.0 to its current Vega 64, Nvidia has maintained a consistent edge for the last 6 years.

On newspaper, the GTX 680 looks fairly modernistic. Its cadre counts, fill up rate (32.2GPixels/due south) and memory bandwidth (192.2GB/s) are both on par with modern midrange cards. But given its historic period — vi years onetime is old for a GPU, even in our modern era — and its architectural obsolescence, can it compete with modern cards at all?

According to Techspot'south results, the answer is "admittedly, aye." The site put the GTX 680 up against the old AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost, besides as matching it confronting the GTX 1050 Ti, GTX 1050, RX 560, and GTX 580. You lot should hit the site for a game-past-game breakdown; we've got the eight-game boilerplate result below:

Image by Techspot.

The overall performance between the 1050 Ti and the GTX 680 is remarkably similar. And even better, older cards like this should be largely immune from the cryptocurrency mining craze. The GTX 680 and other cards from the Kepler family were terrible at cryptocurrency mining thanks to a number of factors, including the manner Nvidia organized the GPU — with 192 cores per SMX, Nvidia needed to extract very high levels of parallelism to keep each SMX unit decorated. This is good news for modern buyers, since it means there's no demand to worry most the bill of fare'south having been inappropriately driveling in mining workloads — though there is, of course, still the chance that they've been driveling in general, given the age of the GPUs at this point.

Best of all, eBay prices on GPUs similar the GTX 680 are pretty reasonable, with auctions and listings in the $65 to $100 range. The current lowest price on a GTX 1050 Ti, according to Newegg, is $220. Be advised the GTX 780 and 780 Ti are both Kepler-era cards with significantly more horsepower than the GTX 680, and they're available on eBay too, for around $100 to $150 (GTX 780) and ~$200ish (GTX 780 Ti). Information technology's difficult to recommend people drib $200 on a GTX 780 Ti given that it's express to 3GB of RAM and was new in 2022, but it's even harder to recommend people spend $220 on a GTX 1050 Ti, an entry-level GPU currently selling for 1.58x its MSRP. If the GTX 680 can friction match the 1050 Ti, the 780 Ti will absolutely level information technology.

Also, check Techspot'southward link for some interesting information on system level ability consumption during these tests. GPU operation may not grow at the speed information technology used to dorsum when doubling every single year was normal. But the huge efficiency gain from the GTX 680 to the GTX 1050 Ti shows how much progress we've made in performance/watt.